“The city is an economic engine”. This built-in assumption is rooted in so many studies that it had become taken for granted. This video argues that as many urban indicators scale superlinearly, “Knowledge Spillover” just can’t be the mechanism behind it… but doing it in plain English.
What is “Super-linear”?
What is “Knowledge Spillover”?
“The city is an economic engine”. This built-in assumption is now rooted in so many studies that it had become taken for granted. To the point where no one pauses to ask whether or not it’s true anymore. If you are as fascinated with cities as I am, it is clear to you that this claim is pivotal, so why are its supporting arguments so vague and easy to refute?
Quite a few studies demonstrate that large cities are associated with high levels of productivity. This statistical correlation is the basis for the assumption that the city is an economic engine. This is the claim that I intend to dismantle. I am not arguing with the facts, only with the conclusions made by the various researchers.